Today's popular content
- Register of Religious Groups NOT opting-in
- May, the "progressive choice"
- Protecting belief in traditional marriage: public authorities
- Agreement/Disagreement of Relevant Marriage
- Exemptions for equality in provision of public services
- Protection for discrimination in offering of blessings
- Prevention of Depriving Appointments to Public Office
- Conscientious Objections
- Protection for belief about marriage
- Defining relevant person to give consent to a place of worship offering marriage of same sex couples
- BSFA Awards 2013 - Voting Thoughts
- Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013: some thoughts
- Liverpool Pride: Dilemma
- A New Hope...
- Sansa's Lemon Cakes
- Charity
- Yorkshire Three Peaks
- Villagers
- Dutch Uncles
- Johnny Marr
- Dog Is Dead
- James
- Alt-J
- Sigur Ros
- Public Service Broadcasting
Pages
User login
Permission for Sikh-based marriages of same-sex couples
Submitted by penwing on Sat, 06/15/2013 - 15:13
Bill:
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill 2013
Stage:
LordsC
Proposer:
Lord Singh of Wimbledon
Verdict:
Unknown
Synopsis:
This amendment would specify who, in Sikhism, can authorise the marriage of a same sex couple of whom at least one is housebound.
This is Number 22 in the Marshalled List of amendments to be discussed 17th June. For the discussions on the amendments see here.
Commentary:
This is a specific person and ties UK Sikhism in law to the Shri Gurdwara Parbandhak Committe in Amritsar India. I have no idea (again) about the hierarchies, but specifically tying it to any particular person, especially one from outside the UK does lead me to tentative concerns.
Amendment:
Clause 5
Page 6, line 39, at end insert “and for Sikhs, the relevant governing authority is the
Shri Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) in Amritsar India”
Bill Text:
5 Opt-in: other religious ceremonies
After section 26A of the Marriage Act 1949 insert—
26BOpt-in to marriage of same sex couples: other religious ceremonies
(1)A marriage may, in any of the following cases, be solemnized on the authority of two certificates of a superintendent registrar.
...
(6) Case C is where—
(a) the marriage is of a same sex couple according to religious rites or usages (other than the rites of the Church of England),
(b) one or each of the couple is house-bound or a detained person,
(c) the marriage is at the usual place of residence of the house-bound or detained person or persons, and
(d)the relevant governing authority has given written consent to marriages of same sex couples according to those religious rites or usages.(7) For that purpose—
“relevant governing authority” means the person or persons recognised by the members of the relevant religious organisation as competent for the purpose of giving consent for the purposes of this section and for Sikhs, the relevant governing authority is the Shri Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) in Amritsar India;
“relevant religious organisation” means the religious organisation according to whose rites or usages the marriage is to be solemnized.(8)Subsection (6) does not authorise a marriage that may be solemnized under subsection (2) or (4).”.
